![]() ![]() if it is the exact same game only with the chosen added in then I would start with Long war of the chosen without fear that I might be missing out on something inside long war 2 (without the chosen). the covert missions where you could upgrade a soldier stats or reduce the avatar project without attacking a base head on were amazing to me (the ability to create an overpowered soldier) however I need to know if this content made long war 2 worse or better. Taking a shot from Shadow Mode, the Reapers have a chance to be revealed to the enemy. The Reapers are a long-range class that try to remain hidden and in the shadows which is one of their abilities. Each group has unique abilities in-mission. I rather play chosen content, I really like the hero units, the lost and the chosen. Three new factions can be aligned with in War of the Chosen: The Reapers, Skirmishers, and Templars. How much different are they? did long war 2 chosen change long war 2 very little in terms of balance in order to put chosen content inside, or are the two so different that people should start playing long war 2 first? I read somewhere that long war 2 chosen runs better than the original long war 2 and has more bug fixes, if that's true then adding the extra content from vanilla chosen, why would anyone play long war 2 instead of long war 2 of the chosen? if you would be so kind as to help me out.Īre the people who made long war 2 the same people who made long war 2 chosen? if not should I be worried? as someone who was a bit upsad we got long war 2 without the chosen I'm overjoyed that it's finally patched in. Now that I'm about done with Xcom 2 war of the chosen, and LWOTC is finally out. it was fucking amazing and I have like 900 hours on that game. I loved Long war in Xcom 1, they made mechs and the new enemy armor into a 1000% better game. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |